User talk:Radarhump: Difference between revisions

0
6
User talk:Radarhump: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 41: Line 41:

:well ig I’ll just have to fuck around with my talk page until eternity [[User:Radarhump|Radarhump]] ([[User talk:Radarhump#top|talk]]) 17:28, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

:well ig I’ll just have to fuck around with my talk page until eternity [[User:Radarhump|Radarhump]] ([[User talk:Radarhump#top|talk]]) 17:28, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

::Actually, if you continue to {{tq|fuck around with my talk Page}}, then you may have the ability to edit your talk Page be revoked. [[User:Babysharkboss2|<span style=”color: red; font-family: Comic Sans MS;”>Babysharkboss2!!</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Babysharkboss2|<span style=”color:blue”>I spread pro-Weezer propaganda</span>]])</sup> 17:55, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

::Actually, if you continue to {{tq|fuck around with my talk Page}}, then you may have the ability to edit your talk Page be revoked. [[User:Babysharkboss2|<span style=”color: red; font-family: Comic Sans MS;”>Babysharkboss2!!</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Babysharkboss2|<span style=”color:blue”>I spread pro-Weezer propaganda</span>]])</sup> 17:55, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

:::I know that… I read my rejection [[User:Radarhump|Radarhump]] ([[User talk:Radarhump#top|talk]]) 17:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

== Blub ==

== Blub ==


Latest revision as of 17:58, 17 October 2024

User talk:Radarhump: Difference between revisions Hello, I’m GSK. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it’s important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction. While you probably didn’t intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. GSK (talk • edits) 16:41, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what? i didn’t do anything. Radarhump (talk) 16:45, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
say that to dr floflo 976 (i think that’s the usernam) he keeps putting luigis mansion Radarhump (talk) 16:46, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The sandbox is specifically for testing content. It’s not a copyright violation to copy a Wikipedia article into a sandbox for the purposes of testing. GSK (talk • edits) 16:47, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dr floflo kept putting Luigi’s mansion on the sandbox tho and he got warned?? Radarhump (talk) 16:48, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By you, which I reverted because your “warning” was entirely inappropriate and bordered on harassment. GSK (talk • edits) 16:49, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

nonono look on his talk page he got warned by an admin Radarhump (talk) 16:51, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
see
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dr_floflo_974 Radarhump (talk) 16:52, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dr floflo talk page look for the copyright thing here Radarhump (talk) 16:53, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Look for Wikipedia amd copyright Radarhump (talk) 16:54, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming you reported me? Radarhump (talk) 17:01, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I haven’t reported you to anyone. GSK (talk • edits) 17:03, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok why didn’t you respond to the stuff I said about admins warning me and not me Radarhump (talk) 17:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

him* not me loll Radarhump (talk) 17:06, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i knew you reported me -_- I’m new I don’t know what I’m doing Radarhump (talk) 17:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I filed the report after that comment. It became clear to me you were not here to contribute meaningfully to the encyclopedia. Harassing users, policing the sandbox, and pretending to ban yourself are not meaningful contributions. Maybe you should have asked questions at WP:TEAHOUSE and made an effort to contribute instead of doing things “for the lulz.” I will not be discussing it further. GSK (talk • edits) 17:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been vomited on for 82928283882 hours Yucky its all on you

Stop icon
BRO IM NEW IDK WHAT IM DOINGGG Radarhump (talk) 17:20, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you at least tell me what rule my broke in not here for an encyclopedia? Radarhump (talk) 17:36, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

<div class=”user-block uw-block” style=”padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #00ff00; min-height: 40px”>[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style=”margin-left:45px”>You have been ”'[[WP:Blocking policy|vomited on]]”’ for ”’82928283882 hours”’ Yucky its all on you </div><div style=”margin-left:45px”>If you think there are good reasons for being cleaned up, please review Wikipedia’s [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to showering]], then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <code><nowiki>{{clean|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>.  — [[User:Radarhump|Vomit man]] ([[User_talk:Radarhump|talk]]) 15:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)</div></div> Radarhump (talk) 17:20, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TPA revoking needed? Babysharkboss2!! (I spread pro-Weezer propaganda) 17:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’d agree, but if anything, this just continues to prove they’re WP:NOTHERE. GSK (talk • edits) 17:28, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you have been told, he sandbox is specifically for testing content. It’s not a copyright violation to copy a Wikipedia article into a sandbox for the purposes of testing.. So I just went to the sandbox to test and ppl were trolling with copyright stuff as your unblock request will likely fail. As that wasn’t the reason you were blocked. Babysharkboss2!! (I spread pro-Weezer propaganda) 17:27, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

well ig I’ll just have to fuck around with my talk page until eternity Radarhump (talk) 17:28, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, if you continue to fuck around with my talk Page, then you may have the ability to edit your talk Page be revoked. Babysharkboss2!! (I spread pro-Weezer propaganda) 17:55, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know that… I read my rejection Radarhump (talk) 17:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

im just so bored -_- Radarhump (talk) 17:32, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can’t even edit my user page T_T Radarhump (talk) 17:34, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Radarhump (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))


Request reason:

I’m not sure what I’m doing bc I’m new I just went to the sandbox to test and ppl were trolling and removing all my text with a random article so I naturally got mad, I’m sorry if it looked like vandalism..

Decline reason:

This doesn’t tell us what constructive contributions you want to make towards writing this encyclopedia of human knowledge. Please give a specific, substantive example(more than fixing spelling). You only have access to this page to request to be unblocked, if you misuse this page further, you will lose access. 331dot (talk) 17:41, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would like to know the exact reason I was banned. Thanks. {{ping|Jake Wartanberg}} Radarhump (talk) 17:52, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welinton (footballer, born 1989): Difference between revisions

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here